From approved Figma layouts to a live WordPress experience.

Integrx.co is a public example of translating approved visual layouts into a responsive, editable WordPress website while preserving detailed motion and interaction.

Live homepage view

Integrx.co homepage hero with site navigation, a blue integration message, and connected platform illustrations.

Live homepage screenshot captured from integrx.co.

Marga’s role was implementation developer: Marga implemented approved Figma designs as a custom WordPress site using ACF, GSAP, and LottieFiles. Marga did not create the visual design.

A defined brief with a clear implementation role.

  1. The supplied direction

    Approved Figma layouts provided the visual source for the website implementation.

  2. The implementation problem

    Turn that direction into a responsive, editable WordPress experience without losing its interaction details.

  3. Marga’s responsibility

    Implement the responsive website, managed content workflow, and interaction behavior.

  4. The credit boundary

    The visual design came from the supplied files; Marga’s contribution was implementation, not design authorship.

Map the approved system into WordPress.

  1. Structure the approved layouts

    Turn the supplied pages and content needs into the site’s WordPress page structure.

  2. Define editing boundaries

    Decide what editors need to manage while retaining the intended page structure.

  3. Translate responsive states

    Carry the approved visual direction into layouts that work across supported screen sizes.

  4. Implement interaction details

    Bring the specified motion into the working responsive layouts as part of the final interface.

A focused stack with a defined purpose.

  1. WordPress

    The custom website foundation and publishing environment.

  2. ACF

    Managed content fields for the editable experience.

  3. GSAP

    Motion and interaction behavior specified for the site.

  4. LottieFiles

    Animation assets supporting the approved interaction details.

Balance three concerns in one implementation.

  1. Fixed frames, fluid layouts

    Preserve the approved visual hierarchy while adapting each layout beyond a fixed Figma frame.

  2. Editable content, intentional composition

    Give content a practical ACF workflow while keeping it within the intended page structure.

  3. Detailed motion, responsive behavior

    Keep interaction details connected to layouts that change across screen sizes.

A live, responsive website with managed content.

The public outcome is a live responsive custom WordPress website with ACF-managed content and GSAP/LottieFiles interactions. The live site and captured homepage provide a public reference for the implementation; no performance or business metrics are claimed here.

Read the thinking behind the implementation.

These guides unpack the design, content, and motion decisions that connect to this WordPress case study.

How Much Does a Custom WordPress Website Cost?

Understand what drives custom WordPress website costs, compare project scenarios, and prepare a clearer brief for a more reliable estimate.

ACF vs Gutenberg: A Decision Guide

A balanced ACF vs Gutenberg guide for choosing structured fields, blocks, or a hybrid editing model for a custom WordPress marketing site.

GSAP WordPress Performance Guide

A practical guide to adding GSAP to WordPress marketing sites without avoidable loading, main-thread, responsive, or accessibility costs.

My Figma-to-WordPress Theme Workflow

My practical process for turning Figma designs into a custom WordPress theme, from handoff and content modeling to responsive QA and launch.

Planning a similar WordPress implementation?

Share the approved designs, content workflow, required interactions, and current project context. The Custom WordPress Development service explains the implementation path, or you can start with a practical conversation.